function pointers - whats wrong ???_(re)

09 Feb 1997 14:26:00 +0200

Hallo Peter,

Am 07.02.97 um 16:07
sagtest Du zum Thema "Re: function pointers - whats wrong ???":

> > It's possible to speed up the standard compilation of gpc for my pentium?
> > What's the floating point type of gpc's complex numbers?
>
>     G:\DJGPP\BIN> stubedit ld.exe
>     ...
>     Size of real-memory transfer buffer [...]:  64k

Yeah, it runs better.

> > I'm working on a direct GRX20-Unit (contexts, mouse, ...) but I don't know
> > if it's needed by anybody else me.
>
> 8-)
>
> I would really prefer to work with a direct GRX20 Unit because I expect
> it to be more powerful than Borland's "BGI" interface.  So please go on
> with it!  :-)

I do it.

You also still working on the GPC-TurboVision ???
I try to make some GUI-Parts for my fractal program using the grx20, it  
would be great if we could do the tv-funcionality for text and grafix.

> However I join Sven in asking:  Anybody is using Objects with GPC?

I'm implemented the first parts of my GUI without objects, but everybody  
knows that a gui is a thing should be made strictly using objects...

> I am thinking about improving object functionality, but if I am the
> only one who uses them, it's not worth the effort because GPC's objects
> essentially meet my needs like they are right now.

Also I think about to implement the different fractal types and color mode  
types as objects. IMHO it's more easy to classify the different types and  
to handle the sources. I'm only will using the objects for this part if I  
dont lose lots of speed (I think 5% it's worth).


BTW: GPC is'nt perfect and this will take a long time too but I like it in  
spite of that.


      ___,
    ((__         o
   ,____)) V E N I

Sven Hilscher (Sven@rufus.central.de (Sven Hilscher))